Tuesday, May 15, 2007

My children will not work in fast-food

During high school and college, I worked at the golden arches and my wife worked for the christian chicken sandwich guy. My kids will never do that. When I told this to my wife, her response astounded me.

"What's wrong with fast food?"

Growing up, I was ambitious. My first job was bagging groceries at the local C-Town where my mom worked. I was eight. I worked for tips. When it came time to get a job in high school, I fell into the trap that most kids do--I didn't think I had options. I thought that I was limited to the minimum wage work that most kids do: fast food joints, groceries stores, movie theaters and rentals. My mother thought those were my options and didn't push me. My wife thinks those are the options. Most people think those are the options.

Job options for kids are as open as the sky.

While looking at some incomplete ironing last week, I yearned for the day when my kids would be old enough to do it for me. Why not start a neighborhood laundry service? The kids could undercut the dry cleaning businesses by keeping less overhead (no rent) and labor costs (they're kids) while offering extra services like picking up (it's only down the street).

Park cars. Intern with a professional (lawyer, doctor, architect). Walk people between their cars and their destination in the dry comfort of an umbrella (weather permitting). Dumpster dive, wander garage sales and hit pawn shops and resell the finds online. Mentor at a summer camp or tutor in an after school program. If the work is generic, make sure the people aren't, even if it means starting a company themselves.

Kids can do the same things adults are supposed to do: Find their natural talents and interests and do it for money. For kids, this is much easier because there isn't the stress of needing the work to survive and the barrier for success is much lower when the alternative is $5.15/hr and smelling like french fries.

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Google tries to straddle the ethical fence

Google took a lot of heat for censoring its results in China; even though it alerted users about this and would not give user data to the government (as MSN and Yahoo had), what it did was unethical.

Now, Google had a proposal put to shareholders that would have prevented that kind of behavior. The board told shareholders to vote it down. The shareholders voted it down.

It's agreed that Google has fought for users rights more vigilantly than others; but they say that their motto is "Do No Evil". That's a lie. Their motto is "do as little evil while maximizing shareholder value".

I saw this happen when EarthLink and MindSpring merged and the MindSpring Core Values and Beliefs were discarded in favor of higher executive salaries and bonuses, off-shoring and layoffs, and manipulative behavior from the top down. Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's ethical. In comparison to the companies that are evil (solely led by the dollar to the exclusion of all other values), Google is pretty good.

Why should Google be proud to be the tallest midget?

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

My daughter is a treehugger in training.

While sorting the recycling (one of her almost daily responsibilities), my six year old daughter came across a stack of papers my wife had printed out, read, and discarded for recycling. She came to me and told me we didn't need to take it to the recycling center because she can use the other side for drawing paper. Brilliant.