Thursday, October 09, 2008

Dan Savage on hot teenagers, asshole parents and vows that you may come to regret...

I tried cutting this down to a paragraph or two but it didn't work. The punchlines are funny but they are only there to lighten otherwise horrific truths and people need to recognize the truth.

The 17-year-old daughter of Sarah Palin, the GOP's vice-presidential nominee, is pregnant. The news was released by the McCain camp during a busy week—a hurricane, the Republican National Convention, Dick Cheney getting us into a war with Russia—so it didn't receive the coverage it deserved. To recap:

Seventeen-year-old Bristol Palin got her ass knocked up five or so months ago by 18-year-old Levi Johnston. Among the hobbies listed on Levi's since-yanked MySpace page—"fishing, shoot some shit, and just fuckin' chillin'"—was this revealing tidbit: "I don't want kids." But Bristol, says her mom, "made the decision on her own to keep the baby," and is now engaged to Levi "Shootin' Shit" Johnston.

As the adoptive parent of a child born to a pair of unwed teenagers, I'm certainly not in favor of abortion in all circumstances. But I believe that it's a choice teenagers should be able to make for themselves—with input from their families whenever possible—and, so it seems, does the GOP's VP nominee. Sarah Palin is pleased that her daughter made the decision—on her own—to keep the baby.

But Sarah Palin doesn't believe that other girls should be able to make their own decisions. Sarah Palin believes abortion should be illegal in almost every instance—including rape and incest. So Bristol Palin is being celebrated for making a choice that Sarah Palin would like to take away from all other American women. Apparently, today's GOP believes that choice is a special right reserved for the wayward daughters of Republican elected officials.

Oh, and Sarah Palin also believes that birth control shouldn't be made available to teenagers, she opposes medically accurate sex education, and she backs abstinence-until- marriage sex "education."

Sigh.

The GOP has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into abstinence "education" programs during the Bush years. I believe this enormous investment of public funds begs the obvious question: Is our children abstaining? Sarah Palin's aren't. Despite this massive outlay on the part of the American taxpayer and the example set by her Christian parents, Bristol Palin became sexually active while still in high school. Excuse me, but if abstinence education can't keep the daughter of the evangelical governor of Alaska off the cock, what hope is there for the daughters—and some of the sons—of average Americans?

I'm a cad for writing this, of course, because shortly before Bristol and Levi were paraded before cheering throngs at the Republican National Convention, the Palins asked the media to respect their daughter's privacy.

Another special right: When it comes to respecting your family's privacy, Palin and the GOP see no need. They want to micromanage the most intimate aspects of your private life. And if their own kids fail to live up to the standards that Palin and the GOP seek to impose on your family, well, that's a private matter between the Palins, their daughter, their God, and the thousands of screaming imbeciles in elephant hats waving McCain/Palin signs on the floor of the Republican National Convention.
- Dan Savage, Savage Love: Teen Beat

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

QOTD: Why gay people hate marriage

"One of the joys of being gay and having lots of gay friends was the knowledge that at least half our acquaintances would never encumber us with wedding lists at Peter Jones or the social obligation to spend the better part of a Saturday in enforced merriment in the company of a crew of people we didn’t know and would never meet again, and in a cause — a marriage — whose prospects we secretly knew to be patchy at best, but that we were obliged to celebrate as the beginning of perpetual bliss.

"After the mid-point of one’s life an understanding dawns that there are only a finite number of Saturdays left. Those tempted to invite an older person to their wedding should ponder the possibility that they are asking for the commitment of an appreciable portion of someone’s remaining leisure-time to compulsory jollity on another’s behalf. A marriage can be dissolved. A bachelorhood can be regained. A lost Saturday never can.

"At the core of the celebration of a marriage is a half-lie. This thing may or may not work out — but guests are obliged to pretend otherwise, and in a ceremony that goes on too long and is followed by hours hanging around for a ghastly reception to start, where one will have to explain again, to increasingly drunken acquaintances and for the umpteenth time, that the reason one declines to dance is that one really doesn’t want to dance."

--Matthew Parris, "Hurrah for the new gay 'weddings'. But please don't invite me along"

Labels: , ,