Thursday, October 17, 2013

"Yes, everyone is entitled to an opinion, but what right does a person have to share that opinion if it causes harm to another person?"

It's rare that someone says so plainly what they mean: If I don't like what you say, you shouldn't be allowed to say it.

Words -- labels -- are thrown around very carelessly. If someone cracks a joke and someone else feels offended, it is "harassment" or "bullying" or "harm". In reality, it's neither, but by attaching those specific words, "I felt insulted" is put alongside sexual harassment and stalking and assault.

That quote came about in reference to a Facebook page which posted images of obese persons in costumes. The page was likely mean-spirited. It was insulting. Did it rise to the level at which we say, "You aren't allowed to say that?"

In the meat world, there are lots of public spaces. In the public spaces, the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution permits one to say nearly anything they want. And someone is allowed to respond in kind -- in speech. Those public spaces are bordered by private spaces where you can continue to speak your mind, without needing to share the space. You're allowed to express hate for anyone. Blacks. Jews. Gays. Women. Immigrants. You can say some pretty vile stuff. Your right to say it is codified in our primary legal document.

On the internet, there are NO public spaces. Everything is private space owned or provided by someone else and you have no rights. If they don't like what you say, they can find someone in the chain -- the forum, the hosting provider, the ISP, even the DNS registrar -- who will pull the plug on you rather than deal with whatever harassment or bullying they get from the people who don't like what you say.

Yes, some of it rises to actual harassment and bullying. Filing a complaint is one thing -- going onto forums to badmouth the company, contacting business partners, trying to cause them enough harm that they'll do what you want, that IS bullying. It IS harassment.

And yet, because of the internet, you don't pass anything you don't choose to. There's no issue of sitting in the park with your kids and seeing hateful signs across the street. Those kinds of borders are entire walls on the internet. You cannot see through them. If you don't like a Facebook page, you don't have to click on it. That's it!

Or, at least, it should be. However, rather than making the personal choice to avoid something, rather than fighting speech with more speech, someone tries to make enough noise, disrupt operations enough that someone in the chain says, "Enough!" and yanks the page down.

Because if what you say harms someone, what right do you have to say it? In the real world, you have every right. On the internet, you have none

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Who's your Baddie?

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, January 16, 2009

Beware of FREE (part 2): There's no such thing as a FREE account.

I previously wrote about dangers of relying on "free" services because you relinquish control (and effectively ownership) of your property to the administrators of the services.

An economics teacher of mine repeatedly lectured that "There's no such thing as a free lunch." We don't exist in a vacuum and everything has a cost, even if you don't see it. When you sign up for a "free" account (like the Google one I'm using now) you're paying for that account, but not with money. Usually, you're paying with personal information. There is plenty of in-depth coverage of what websites do with your information and that's not my focus.

I just want you to know, it's not free.

Every "free" service you use is using you in return. Every time you connect two discrete facts together by "friending" someone on a website or listing your favorite books or reveal anything about yourself, you're paying that company for their service. There are billions of globally known facts about you; what isn't known is that you are always you. How does a company distinguish the John Smith who likes Ford Mustangs from the John Smith who likes sushi and also know that the first one is a vegetarian? They know it because you tell them. That information now belongs to them. You're paying them for their service.

In perpetuity.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, January 21, 2008

Dr. King says, "Drink Malt Liquor"

Last year, students at Tarleton State University celebrated Martin Luther King's birthday with "an off-campus party in which students dressed in hip-hop attire and sported 40-ounce bottles of malt liquor. Photos from the ``Bullets & Bubbly'' party were posted on Facebook.com."

These kids are not alone:
In October, a group of first-year law students at the University of Texas at Austin were chided by the dean for participating in a “Ghetto Fabulous”-themed costume party and posting pictures online. Partygoers carried 40-ounce bottles of malt liquor and wore Afro wigs, necklaces with large medallions and name tags bearing historically black and Hispanic names.
But don't be afraid, the government is ready to crack down on these horrific parties that occur on private property and without public funding or support and involve no one getting hurt.
“If you look up the definitions for stereotype, bigot and prejudice, you will see they all mean the same thing. All those words are based on prejudging another class of people, which is exactly what Dr. King was fighting against,” [State Rep. Garnet F. Coleman, D-Houston] said in a statement. “What these students did and the day they did it on shows they were trying to be purposefully ignorant and prejudiced.”
Actually, Mr. State Representative, "stereotype", "bigot" and "prejudice" mean different things.

Some photos were archived at The Smoking Gun.

I'm gonna get rich when I invent malt liquor flavored fried chicken.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

QOTD: Double Entendre

14:45:56 <+chaosite> Shadow42: the only difference between myspace and facebook is that facebook doesn't let you redesign your own page without 1337 skr1p7 k1dd1e sk1llz
14:46:05 <+Shadow42> mm
14:46:18 <+Shadow42> And Myspace is more likely to get you raped.
14:47:28 <+chaosite> Shadow42: rape is such a strong word... "suprise buttsex" is much nicer
14:47:42 <+Shadow42> chaosite: It rolls off the tongue more easily too
14:47:49 <+Shadow42> Dammit, I hate double entendres
--#freenode-social on irc.freenode.com, 20061106

Labels: , , , , ,